Current climate policies will leave more than a FIFTH of humanity exposed to dangerously hot temperatures by 2100, study warns
- Scientists found that current policies will result in global warming of 4.9F (2.7C)
- READ MORE: There’s 98% chance one of next 5 years will be hottest on RECORD
Current climate policies will leave more than a fifth of humanity exposed to dangerously hot temperatures by 2100, a study has warned.
Led by scientists at the University of Exeter, the study found that the legally binding measures currently in place will result in global warming of 4.9F (2.7C) by the end of the century.
This means two billion people – around 22 per cent of the projected end-of-century population – will be exposed to dangerous heat, with average temperatures of 84.2F (29C) or more.
At these high temperatures, water resources could become strained, mortality could increase, economic productivity could decrease, animals and crops could no longer flourish, and large numbers of people may migrate.
Globally, there are 60million people already exposed to this heat.
A wildfire burns forest in the surroundings of the village of Memoria, in the municipality of Leiria, in the centre of Portugal on July 12
This map shows the difference between how many areas globally would see average temperatures of more than 84.2F (29C) – shown by the black mesh covering. The top map is how many areas would see these temperatures under the projected global warming of 4.9F (2.7C). The bottom map is the difference if warming is limited to 2.7F (1.5C)
READ MORE: Extreme weather has killed 2 MILLION people since 1970, shocking report reveals
Extreme weather, climate and water-related events have caused 11,778 disasters in the last half century, killing two million people and causing trillions of dollars of economic damage
However, the researchers suggest there is ‘huge potential’ for decisive climate policy to limit the human costs of climate change.
They say the forecasts show that limiting global warming to 2.7F (1.5C), in line with the Paris Agreement, would mean five times fewer people are exposed to extreme heat.
The study, which was in association with scientists from the Earth Commission and Nanjing University in China, also found that the lifetime emissions of 3.5 average global citizens today would expose one future person to the dangerous conditions.
And in the US, this was even more concerning, as it was found just 1.2 US citizens’ emissions would have the same result. This means that for almost every average person in America, their individual contribution to climate change over their lifetime could result in another person living in dangerous heat in the future.
The authors said this highlights the inequity of the climate crisis – as the people living in areas which will see extreme heat, are likely not to blame for it.
In fact, the study found that people set to be exposed to dangerous temperatures will live in places where emissions today are around half the global average.
The countries found to be at greatest future risk of extreme heat exposure are India and Nigeria, with 600million people in the former, and 300million in the latter, possibly exposed by 2100.
Other countries where large populations are at risk include Indonesia, the Philippines, Pakistan and Sudan.
And almost 100 per cent of Burkino Faso and Mali – countries with smaller populations of around 21million – could be dangerously hot for humans.
Professor Tim Lenton, director of the Global Systems Institute at the University of Exeter, said: ‘Our study highlights the phenomenal human cost of failing to tackle the climate emergency.
‘For every 0.1C (0.18F) of warming above present levels, about 140 million more people will be exposed to dangerous heat.’
Professor Lenton said this highlights both the scale of the problem and the importance of decisive action being taken by officials to reduce carbon emissions.
An aerial view shows smoke following a massive bushfire in Australia’s Fraser Island, also known by its indigenous name K’gari, on November 30
This graph shows how many people (left) and what percentage of land (right) could be exposed to dangerous heat by 2100
‘Limiting global warming to 1.5C (2.7F) rather than 2.7C (4.9F) would mean five times fewer people in 2100 being exposed to dangerous heat,’ he added.
The research team, made up of scientists from around the world, say that the worst of these impacts can be avoided by rapid action to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
Wendy Broadgate, Executive Director of the Earth Commission at Future Earth, said: ‘We are already seeing effects of dangerous heat levels on people in different parts of the world today.’
She added that this will only accelerate unless ‘immediate and decisive action’ is taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Professor Marten Scheffer, of Wageningen University, who co-authored the report, said: ‘We were triggered by the fact that the economic costs of carbon emissions hardly reflect the impact on human wellbeing.’
‘Our calculations now help bridging this gap and should stimulate asking new, unorthodox questions about justice.’
The paper, titled Quantifying the Human Cost of Global Warming, was published in the Nature Sustainability journal.
THE PARIS AGREEMENT: A GLOBAL ACCORD TO LIMIT TEMPERATURE RISES THROUGH CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION TARGETS
The Paris Agreement, which was first signed in 2015, is an international agreement to control and limit climate change.
It hopes to hold the increase in the global average temperature to below 2°C (3.6ºF) ‘and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C (2.7°F)’.
It seems the more ambitious goal of restricting global warming to 1.5°C (2.7°F) may be more important than ever, according to previous research which claims 25 per cent of the world could see a significant increase in drier conditions.
The Paris Agreement on Climate Change has four main goals with regards to reducing emissions:
1) A long-term goal of keeping the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels
2) To aim to limit the increase to 1.5°C, since this would significantly reduce risks and the impacts of climate change
3) Governments agreed on the need for global emissions to peak as soon as possible, recognising that this will take longer for developing countries
4) To undertake rapid reductions thereafter in accordance with the best available science
Source: European Commission
Source: Read Full Article